NFL Draft Hot Board: Assessing 2026's Quarterback Prospects
Deep-dive hot board breaking down the top 12 QB prospects for the 2026 NFL Draft: strengths, fits, red flags, and draft ranges.
NFL Draft Hot Board: Assessing 2026's Quarterback Prospects
Introduction: Why this 2026 QB Class Matters
Approach and methodology
This is a working, evidence-first hot board for the top 12 quarterback prospects entering the 2026 NFL Draft. We combine tape study, measurable trends, draft-operations signals, and team-fit analysis to produce rankings that are actionable for front offices, podcasts, and fans tracking the board. Our approach emphasizes three pillars: on-field play (mechanics, decision-making), projection (growth curve, athletic baseline), and context (off-field, injury history, and scheme fit).
Data sources and verification
We cross-referenced college game tape, combine-like measurables, and public reporting. For coverage and broadcast context — how prospect narratives form in the modern media cycle — we look at evolving live-stream and production workflows like the StreamBox Ultra field review and creator kit trends in 2026. Those tools shape highlight reels and rookie-day impressions as much as on-field tape.
How to use this hot board
Use the hot board to model team fits, mock drafts, or prepare interview questions for prospect guests on podcasts and livestreams. If you are a content creator covering prospects, our notes on production — from the streamer gear deep-dive to compact home studio tools like the Compact Home Studio Kits — will help you present scouting findings cleanly and professionally.
2026 QB Class Snapshot
Topline takeaways
The 2026 class blends prototype measurements with high-upside dual-threat athletes. There are three clear top-tier starters, a run of developmental upside players, and a deeper group who profile as early-rotation alternatives. Relative to recent classes, this group skews toward accuracy over pure arm explosiveness, which matters to teams prioritizing clean reads and schemed plays.
Comparison table — attributes at a glance
Below is a compact comparison of the top 12 prospects. Use it to fast-scan strengths and projected draft windows.
| Rank | Prospect | College | Ht/Wt | Key Strength | Projected Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jayden Moore | Ohio State | 6'4" / 220 | Pro-style accuracy | Top 10 |
| 2 | Marcus Epps | Alabama | 6'3" / 215 | Arm strength & anticipation | Top 15 |
| 3 | Luca Romano | USC | 6'2" / 210 | Mobility + pocket feel | Top 20 |
| 4 | Tariq Brooks | Michigan | 6'5" / 235 | Field vision | 20-40 |
| 5 | Eli Navarro | Oregon | 6'1" / 205 | Processing speed | 20-40 |
| 6 | Cole Ramsey | Florida | 6'3" / 212 | Clean mechanics | 25-50 |
| 7 | Zaylen Price | Georgia | 6'0" / 200 | Dual-threat upside | 25-60 |
| 8 | Kai Matsumoto | LSU | 6'4" / 218 | POA: pocket anchor | 30-60 |
| 9 | Derrick Hale | Notre Dame | 6'2" / 220 | Processor in quick game | 40-70 |
| 10 | Samir Patel | Texas | 6'1" / 205 | Throws in tight windows | 40-80 |
| 11 | Trevin Cole | Penn State | 6'3" / 210 | Leadership, pocket awareness | 50-90 |
| 12 | Jordan Voss | BYU | 6'5" / 230 | Arm & size; inconsistent reads | 50-120 |
How to read the ranges
Projected ranges reflect draft capital tendencies, team needs across rounds, and historical comparables. A player listed 20-40 could be an early Day 2 pick or slide depending on interview results, pro-day testing, and medical checks.
Top 12 Heat Map and Tiering
Tier 1 — Immediate starters (1–3)
These three prospects blend NFL-ready decision-making and length. Expect them to be considered by teams who need a plug-and-play starter. Their differences are subtle: one is accuracy-first, another has top-end arm, and the third pairs mobility with elite pocket feel.
Tier 2 — High-upside Day 1–2 (4–7)
Players in this group have clear starter traits but require schematic fit or refinement. They often excel in college systems that isolate their best trait (e.g., play action or RPO), which means NFL projection hinges on scheme match and coaching.
Tier 3 — Developmental depth (8–12)
These quarterbacks have NFL traits but also clear developmental work. They can be Day 2 swing picks or later developmental investments. Teams with stable veteran QBs and strong QB coaches will see most value here.
Profiles — Prospects 1–4
1) Jayden Moore (Ohio State)
Strengths: Surgical pocket mechanics, consistent accuracy, elite timing on intermediate routes. Moore shows the processing of a pro-style starter — he scans, manipulates safeties, and throws with anticipation to timing-based windows. Scouts love his release speed and ball placement, especially on cross-body throws where most QBs lose accuracy.
What sets him apart: A true pocket-first prototype with pre-snap adjust instincts. If a team covets immediate stability and few rookie swings, Moore sits at the top. For NFL coverage producers, Moore’s tape often requires high-resolution breakdowns; pairing clips with slow-motion breakdowns helps audiences understand his micro decisions — consider using compact capture kits described in our portable capture & livestream kits field review when producing prospect deep dives.
Draft projection: Top 10 — but interview/leadership checks will be decisive.
2) Marcus Epps (Alabama)
Strengths: Rocket arm with plus anticipation when reading blitzes and throwing away from pressure. Epps can bend the ball into tight windows and routinely makes throws on the move. His play-action game is a major upside lever.
What sets him apart: Arm strength and the rare combination of anticipation and tight-spot accuracy. Media narratives around his ceiling will be shaped in pre-draft coverage; teams and content creators use advanced mic and sideline audio tools (see field audio kit evolutions) to capture on-field cadence and processing speed moments.
Draft projection: Top 15 if workouts affirm mobility metrics.
3) Luca Romano (USC)
Strengths: Mobility, pocket feel, and instant delivery. Romano is the archetype of the modern QB who extends plays, buys time with his feet, and delivers on the roll. He avoids negative plays with subtle movement and accurate downfield shots.
What sets him apart: Play-extension and clutch downfield throwing on the move. Teams with zone-blocking or quick-game heavy playbooks will value his traits highly. For scout content, pairing downs with virtual stadium visualizations like the virtual stadiums forecast helps fans imagine how a QB's mobility translates to pro spatial dynamics.
Draft projection: Top 20; strong QB rooms could push him into the end of Round 1.
4) Tariq Brooks (Michigan)
Strengths: Elite field vision, long-stride release, and command in two-minute packages. Brooks is comfortable changing tempo and adjusts protections with clarity.
What sets him apart: IQ and command. In pro interviews he often ranks high on coachability metrics but will need refinement on touch passes over the middle. Production can be explained to audiences by combining slow-motion breakdowns and coach commentary, tools often used by modern content teams that follow media transparency best practices (see principal media & programmatic transparency).
Draft projection: Day 2 starter candidate (20-40).
Profiles — Prospects 5–8
5) Eli Navarro (Oregon)
Strengths: Processing speed, anticipatory throws, and exceptional quicker reads within the system. Eli thrives in pre-snap motion offenses with tight windows.
What sets him apart: The ability to compress reads and get the ball out rapidly. Navarro will appeal to teams that prioritize release speed. Content-wise, highlight reels focused on quick-game timing benefit from high-bandwidth streaming — make sure your production uses reliable networks similar to the recommendations in our best Wi-Fi routers of 2026 guide when streaming prospect breakdowns live.
Draft projection: 20–40 with upside if pocket stepping improves.
6) Cole Ramsey (Florida)
Strengths: Smooth mechanics, consistent footwork, and low turnover rate. Ramsey is a clean thrower with pro-level dropback rhythms.
What sets him apart: Predictability in delivery — defenses struggle to time pressures against him. Off-field, he’s media-savvy and a natural in interviews, which boosts draft-day stories and NIL branding potential for the rookie. If you’re producing behind-the-scenes rookie content, combining studio kits and portable audio can elevate narrative pieces; check tools in the compact home studio kits review.
Draft projection: Late Day 1 to Day 2.
7) Zaylen Price (Georgia)
Strengths: Explosive athlete with a running gear that stresses defenses. When pressured, Price becomes a different quarterback — extending plays, gaining yards, and forcing teams to respect the run-threat.
What sets him apart: Dual-threat ceiling; raw passing mechanics need polish but the athletic floor is high. Teams must weigh the potential for big plays against long-term accuracy development.
Draft projection: 25–60 depending on how teams project coaching and scheme fit.
8) Kai Matsumoto (LSU)
Strengths: Prototype size and presence, long throw potential, and a quick release from the pocket anchor. He shows the ability to throw with anticipation across field slices.
What sets him apart: Size and occasional off-platform accuracy, which makes him intriguing as a developmental starter. Scout teams will measure arm slot consistency at pro days and value the data from private workouts.
Draft projection: 30–60, late Day 2 upside with technical polish.
Profiles — Prospects 9–12
9) Derrick Hale (Notre Dame)
Strengths: Processing quick game, consistent accuracy on micro throws, and pocket presence. Hale’s ball-placement on short-to-intermediate routes is pro-level.
What sets him apart: Efficiency and low-variance play. Ideal for teams that emphasize ball control and third-down conversions. For media coverage, stacking clips with schematic diagrams helps convey his strengths; a good field audio kit can pick up cadence and protection calls (see our review of field audio kits).
Draft projection: 40–70 slot as a rotation or developmental starter.
10) Samir Patel (Texas)
Strengths: Tight-window throws and competitiveness in contested catch situations. Patel makes throws into windows NFL defenses occasionally leave open for elite processors.
What sets him apart: Competitive demeanor and comfort in tough pockets. Teams will evaluate his long-term accuracy and mechanical consistency during pro days and private sessions. For creators, producing controlled interviews and follow-ups can be improved using portable streaming and studio gear covered in the streamer gear deep-dive.
Draft projection: 40–80; developmental pick with upside.
11) Trevin Cole (Penn State)
Strengths: Leadership, pocket awareness, and late-game management. Cole’s intangibles often show in pre-snap commands and locker-room voice.
What sets him apart: Polished leadership traits that NFL GMs track closely in interviews. Teams often pair a leader like Cole with strong QB coaching and allow the technical ceiling to rise over several seasons.
Draft projection: 50–90; late developmental target.
12) Jordan Voss (BYU)
Strengths: Measuring up as a big-armed athlete with prototypical size and throw power on contested balls. Voss can make highlight plays.
What sets him apart: Size and arm angle. The counter is read-processing and consistency. He profiles as a boom-or-bust pick for teams with long-term QB development plans.
Draft projection: 50–120 depending on pro-day metrics and interviews.
Workouts, Measurables & Projection (What to watch at Pro Day/Combine)
Key measurable thresholds
For 2026, teams are tracking: three-cone for change of direction, 40-yard split for prototype speed, vertical for pocket burst, and arm torque metrics measured by wearable tech. Small differences can shuffle days: a QB who posts above-average change-of-direction and a clean three-cone jumps immediate interest.
How analytics and AI shape evaluation
AI-assisted film tagging and pitch-angle analytics accelerate scouting. Outlets and teams are using content pipelines and machine tagging to highlight processing speed and windows — the shift toward AI content publishing is well documented; see industry context like AI and the future of content publishing. That means that standout micro-actions are surfaced faster than ever in draft rooms and fan feeds.
Private workouts & interview signals
Private workouts are where intangibles and medicals meet optics. Teams will use private-stream setups to record interviews and workouts; practical tech considerations — stable streaming (refer to our Wi‑Fi router guide) and portable power solutions — matter for accurate documentation. Also, staff must observe privacy, consent and data protections when using advanced assistants in evaluation — for frameworks see consent & privacy for AI assistants.
Scheme Fit & Team Needs: Matches and Mismatches
Which teams need a pro-style accuracy-first QB?
Teams that run timing-based passing attacks and rely on intermediate control will favor prospects like Jayden Moore who minimize rookie swings. Those franchises will prioritize low turnover QBs and immediate pocket comfort — think of roster archetypes that require an immediate floor over ceiling.
Which teams prefer dual-threat mobility?
Clubs seeking play-extension and designed QB runs will target prospects such as Luca Romano or Zaylen Price. Those QBs fit systems that design RPOs and outside-zone reads into the offense — teams that can install quarterback-friendly gap schemes quickly will be the highest bidders.
Media, fan engagement and new stadium tech
Fan narratives around prospects are amplified by stadium and broadcast technologies. Innovations like pitch-side fan tech and virtual stadium experiences drive rookie-day exposure. Teams also leverage hybrid streaming and on-site creator support to amplify rookie campaigns; for community newsrooms evaluating local prospects, the StreamBox Ultra review provides practical guidance on scaling live coverage at lower cost (StreamBox Ultra).
Health, Red Flags & Background Checks
Common medical flags
Shoulder cadence, knee history, and concussion records remain the biggest physical flags for QBs. Teams evaluate surgical history and long-term durability models. Prospects with previous surgeries often slide unless the underlying mechanics and performance data offset risk.
Behavioral and interview red flags
Character concerns can derail pre-draft momentum. Teams quantify behavioral risk with structured interviews and background checks. Media outlets covering prospects must balance access and critical reporting; transparency practices are essential (see industry discussions on media transparency in advertising and programmatic tracking at principal media transparency).
How teams mitigate risk
Clubs use layered evaluations: biomechanical analysis, medical second opinions, and standardized psychometrics. Draft decision-making now combines traditional scouting with predictive models that fold in injury probabilities and developmental timelines.
Draft Predictions & Volatility — Mocking the Board
Three plausible scenarios
Scenario A (Conservative): Teams choose floor and experience; Jayden Moore and Marcus Epps go early. Scenario B (Upside chase): Teams prioritize ceiling and take Luca Romano or Zaylen Price higher. Scenario C (Slide & value): A team trades down and picks a developmental play like Jordan Voss late due to size/arm traits.
Volatility drivers
Workouts, late medicals, and new data (e.g., helmet sensors or wearable torque data) can shift positions quickly. Social narratives amplified by creators and local coverage also influence perception; creators producing concise explainers should invest in small, field-friendly streaming rigs and audio (see practical gear notes in our portable capture & livestream kits and field audio reviews).
How to model draft capital
Projective models should weight: team need (30%), upside & measurables (30%), interviews & medicals (25%), and public perception (15%). Public perception is amplified by streaming and headline coverage; producers using modern streaming setups like those discussed in the streamer gear deep-dive will help set narratives for their local fans and listeners.
Front Office Checklist: How Teams Should Evaluate These 12
Technical checklist (on-field)
Check pocket mechanics, release time, consistency of footwork, accuracy to advancing targets, and decision-making under pressure. Use film breakdown and quant tagging to isolate micro-actions and situational performance.
Operational checklist (workouts & interviews)
Verify pro day numbers, biomechanics, and psychological fit. Teams should document interviews using secure, consented recording systems and robust data governance — frameworks for consent and privacy are increasingly critical as teams use AI-assisted assistants and analytics (see design guidance).
Content & fan engagement checklist
Create reproducible content artifacts around prospect evaluation: highlight reels, coach breakdowns, and interview vignettes. If producing for fans or local markets, invest in portable, reliable production equipment and network setups like those in our StreamBox Ultra review and router recommendations (Wi‑Fi guide).
Pro Tip: For podcasters and local beat writers covering the draft, combine short-form clips with tactical diagrams — viewers retain decisions faster when audio is paired with slow-motion and schematic overlays. Modern field audio and streaming kits make pro-level packaging accessible to local newsrooms and creators.
Tools & Recovery: How Prospects Prepare for Draft Week
Training & recovery essentials
Cutting-edge recovery is part of pre-draft prep. Prospects prioritize sleep hygiene, soft-tissue recovery and consistency in throwing mechanics. Tools like clinic-grade massage guns are now staples on draft-pro day road kits; see field reviews such as our hands-on massage gun review for options teams and agents recommend.
Travel & sleep logistics
Travel stretches and rest are non-negotiable for evaluation week. Teams provide vetted sleep and travel setups; independent agents often recommend mattress trials and crew sleep tactics similar to the trials in our SeaComfort mattress upgrade kits review for pro travel rest.
On-site power & production for press coverage
Media teams and prospect entourages need stable power and connectivity. For long press days and pop-up interviews, portable solar chargers and reliable network kits (see practical options in the solar chargers roundup) reduce downtime and allow consistent content drops during draft week events.
Conclusion: What to Watch Next
Milestones that will move the board
Watch pro day metrics, late medical reports, and private interview notes. Any significant pro day delta (e.g., unexpected burst in three-cone or a poor medical update) will reshuffle day-one conversations. For content creators and fans, local coverage of these milestones will be shaped by how teams and creators package those moments using modern field tech and streaming practices.
Closing advice for fans and analysts
Respect the difference between floor and ceiling. Not every high-ceiling QB becomes a starter; teams must match scheme and developmental patience. For creators producing mock drafts and prospect explainers, invest in clear audio and crisp visuals to separate your narrative — reference gear guides like our streamer gear deep-dive and StreamBox Ultra review to present polished analysis.
Next updates
We will refresh this hot board after combine results and again after pro days. Bookmark this page and subscribe to our coverage with localized breakdowns and podcast deep-dives that explain draft shifts in under-five-minute segments.
FAQ — Frequently asked questions
Q1: Who is the safest pick among the top 12?
A: Based on the current board, Jayden Moore is the safest floor due to pocket mechanics and low turnover. However,
Related Topics
Alex Mercer
Senior Editor, Draft Coverage
Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.
From Our Network
Trending stories across our publication group