What the Taliban’s Return Means for Afghan Filmmakers — Through the Lens of Berlinale’s Opener

Why this matters: a missing, urgent context for readers overwhelmed by noise

Afghan filmmakers and their work sit at the crossroads of art, testimony and survival. For readers who want fast, trustworthy context on why a Berlinale opener matters, here’s the blunt truth: when a major festival places an Afghan film in its most visible slot it does more than honor an artist — it creates a lifeline for stories under threat. You’ve been caught between clickbait headlines and thin explainers; this piece cuts through, explaining what the Taliban return has meant for cinema inside and outside Afghanistan, why Shahrbanoo Sadat’s No Good Men is both a cultural act and a political signal, and how festivals like Berlinale change the calculus for endangered artists.

The film in focus: Shahrbanoo Sadat’s No Good Men and the Kabul newsroom

Shahrbanoo Sadat’s new film, No Good Men, has been tapped as the opening night gala for the 2026 Berlin International Film Festival (Berlinale). The film’s central setting — a bustling Kabul newsroom during Afghanistan’s democratic era before the Taliban’s return in 2021 — is not incidental. It is a strategic choice that foregrounds journalism, women’s visibility, and the fragile public sphere that existed for less than two decades.

Berlinale will open with Shahrbanoo Sadat’s "No Good Men," set inside a Kabul newsroom during the democratic era, before the Taliban returned to power in 2021.

The newsroom is a cinematic device and a metaphor: an institution where facts are assembled, voices are amplified, and the future is imagined. In Sadat’s case — an Afghan director working in exile — the newsroom narrates what was possible and what has been abruptly curtailed. For audiences in 2026, the film is both a memory artifact and a provocation: what does it take to preserve a public sphere when brutal political forces close it down?

What the Taliban’s return actually changed — beyond headlines

The Taliban’s takeover in August 2021 had immediate and structural consequences for cultural production. The practical impacts for filmmakers and cultural workers include:

• Systematic restrictions on women’s public presence and employment, which curtailed on-screen participation and disabled half of the creative workforce.
• Censorship and the collapse of independent venues, funding lines, and training institutions that supported filmmaking during the 2000s and 2010s.
• Heightened surveillance and risk of reprisals for artists whose work documents state violence, gendered oppression, or modern urban life.
• Mass displacement: directors, crew and actors dispersed into regional exile or sought asylum in Europe, North America, and neighboring countries.

Those changes are not just anecdotal. They transformed the production pipeline: scripts that would have found funding domestically now rely on external co-productions; archival materials are increasingly located outside Afghanistan; and distribution flows that once included local theaters are redirected to festival circuits, diaspora screenings, and streaming windows controlled by foreign platforms.

Why festivals matter now: visibility, protection, and the politics of premiere slots

When Berlinale — one of the world’s most prominent film festivals — opens with an Afghan film, three things happen at once:

1. Visibility: Global media attention amplifies the film’s themes and the director’s voice, turning local testimony into an international record.
2. Protection: Festival spotlight can translate into practical safety for artists — from emergency relocation offers to legal support and grant money tied to prizes or sales.
3. Network access: A Berlinale opener guarantees meetings with distributors, curators, and archival institutions — connections that can secure a film’s long-term preservation and income for its creators.

But visibility is double-edged. Increased exposure is lifesaving for some, yet can risk retaliation against family members still inside Afghanistan. Festivals and media partners must navigate these ethical tensions deliberately.

Film as testimony: why cinematic storytelling matters to history and justice

Movies from contexts of repression do something journalism alone cannot: they render subjectivity, nuance and cultural texture. Films like No Good Men archive social life, document institutional collapse, and register emotional truth. In legal and historical terms, cinema becomes part of the archive that future truth commissions, historians, and human rights investigators will consult. Film captures what statutes and press releases often miss — the everyday interactions that bear witness to systemic change.

The risks — ethical and operational — for artists and institutions

Amplification requires responsibility. Practical and ethical risks include:

• Reprisal risk: Public screenings and press can endanger artists’ relatives or collaborators who remain inside Afghanistan.
• Instrumentalization: Cultural work can be co-opted into geopolitical narratives that erase local nuance.
• Tokenization: Festivals may spotlight a handful of artists as symbolic gestures without providing structural support.

Addressing these risks means pairing visibility with protection measures: confidentiality when needed, safe travel arrangements, and long-term partnerships rather than one-off showcases.

Practical, actionable advice for Afghan filmmakers and allies (2026-ready)

Whether you’re an endangered filmmaker, a festival programmer, or a concerned audience member, here are concrete steps you can take in 2026:

For filmmakers (safety, preservation, and distribution)

• Secure multiple encrypted backups: keep at least two geographically separated copies of raw footage and final masters. Use industry-standard archival media (LTO tapes) and a trusted cloud provider with end-to-end encryption (e.g., ProtonMail/ProtonDrive-style services).
• Strip metadata and consider using pseudonyms for sensitive credits when necessary. Maintain a secure ledger of collaborators stored offline or in encrypted form for legal and payment purposes.
• Build festival relationships strategically: prioritize festivals with proven emergency funds, relocation support, and rights-forward distribution deals. Ask about contractual protections for return travel and family visas.
• Explore remote premieres for domestic audiences via secure, time-limited streaming to avoid endangering local viewers while preserving access.
• Document chain-of-custody for footage that could later be used in legal settings; timestamp and geolocate when safe and appropriate. Consult independent legal counsel or human-rights bodies on evidence standards.

For festivals and cultural institutions (responsible visibility)

• Create institutional emergency protocols: guaranteed airfare, humanitarian visas, temporary housing, and stipends for at-risk artists and their immediate families.
• Adopt trauma-informed programming: avoid spectacle, provide content warnings, and offer on-site mental health support and private press options for artists who request them.
• Fund preservation: partner with film archives (national and within FIAF — International Federation of Film Archives) to ensure masters are stored in climate-controlled, secure facilities outside conflict zones.
• Negotiate distribution terms that prioritize artist control and fair remuneration and develop pathways for revenue to be sent safely to displaced creators.

For journalists, curators, and audiences (ethical amplification)

• Amplify with context: reporting should pair festival buzz with grounded analysis of local risks and structural needs — not just accolades.
• Support diaspora screenings and community distribution channels to expand access beyond festival circuits.
• Donate to or volunteer with organizations that offer legal, financial, and mental health support to artists in exile; check legitimacy via established watchdogs.

2026 trends shaping the ecosystem for endangered artists

As of early 2026 several durable trends have reshaped how endangered artists navigate visibility and mobility:

• Hybrid festival models have matured. Post-pandemic innovation means festivals can pair theatrical premieres with secure geo-fenced streams, widening reach while protecting participants.
• Increased institutional coordination. More festivals now maintain cross-border emergency funds and work collectively with consulates and NGOs to facilitate humanitarian visas and fast-track residency options.
• Better archival networks. Film archives and rights organizations have accelerated protocols for off-site, climate-resilient preservation of at-risk collections.
• Market interest in socially engaged cinema has risen, so distribution windows and streaming platforms are more open to acquiring films that document repression — but artists must negotiate terms to avoid exploitative advances.

Case study: what Sadat’s Berlinale slot creates — and what it doesn’t

The symbolic power of a Berlinale opener is substantial. For Shahrbanoo Sadat and No Good Men, the slot creates immediate benefits: international media coverage, potential for awards and sales, and greater bargaining power with distributors and funders. It also signals to other Afghan filmmakers that their stories matter.

What a premiere cannot do alone is rebuild Afghanistan’s industry. That requires sustained investments: training programs for emerging filmmakers, legal protection for women in the arts, and long-term archive projects inside and outside the country. Festivals can be catalysts, but structural change depends on multi-year commitments from states, foundations and industry partners.

Policy levers and institutional responsibilities

Governments, philanthropic foundations, and multilateral bodies each have roles to play:

• Governments should expand cultural refugee pathways and streamline humanitarian visas tied to artistic work. Festivals should be recognized as partners in identifying urgent cases.
• Donors should fund multi-year residencies, not just one-off grants, to prevent a revolving-door of precarious projects.
• International institutions should support digital and physical film archives, ensuring that endangered cultural heritage is preserved under agreed ethical frameworks.

Actionable takeaways — what to do next

1. If you’re an Afghan filmmaker: secure encrypted backups, prioritize festivals with emergency policies, and connect with reputable legal and rights organizations before publicizing sensitive details.
2. If you work at a festival or archive: institute emergency funding, trauma-informed practices, and contractual clauses that safeguard artists and their families.
3. If you’re an engaged audience member: attend screenings, donate to verified artist-support funds, and demand accountability from distributors when they acquire films from endangered creators.

Final analysis: festivals as lifelines, and film as living testimony

In 2026 the global film ecology is a patchwork of new supports and persistent gaps. The return of the Taliban in 2021 created rupture; festivals like Berlinale now play a critical role in offsetting that rupture by giving endangered artists visibility, access, and at times, safety. Shahrbanoo Sadat’s No Good Men — by opening the Berlinale — becomes both a cultural rescue operation and a reclaiming of narrative authority. It demonstrates how a single festival slot can convert private risk into public record and, crucially, monetize a film in ways that can sustain artists in exile.

Call to action

Watch the Berlinale coverage, but don’t stop at headlines: when Sadat’s film premieres, support the artist with concrete action. If you’re a programmer, pledge institutional support; if you’re a viewer, amplify responsibly and donate to verified support networks for displaced Afghan cultural workers. Subscribe to our newsletter for on-the-ground updates, curated resources for filmmakers in exile, and a tracker of festival-backed emergency programs. The stories in No Good Men are not just films — they are pieces of a fragile public memory that must be preserved and protected.

Related Reading

• API Roadmap: Integrating Link Management With Vertical Video Platforms
• Stop Wasting Money on Redundant Solar SaaS: A Decision Matrix for Homeowners and Installers
• Hijab-Compatible Wearables: How to Style a Smartwatch with Abayas and Prayer Routines
• Are Mexican Aguas Frescas Healthier Than the New 'Healthy' Sodas?
• 10 Promo Codes You Can Trust Right Now: Brooks, VistaPrint, Altra and More